Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

1325 Rue Bergar, Laval, QC support@d-central.tech 1-855-753-9997 Mon-Fri: 8:30 - 18:00

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 Specification Innosilicon T3+ 52T
260.0 TH/s Hashrate 52.0 TH/s
4,420 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
17.0 J/TH Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level —
— Weight 10,000.0 kg
15,081 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
— Home Mining Score 22/100
— Release Year —
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011269 BTC $7.99
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$2.62
Monthly -$78.55
Yearly -$955.65

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002254 BTC $1.60
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$5.12
Monthly -$153.66
Yearly -$1,869.55

Based on BTC price of $70,901 and current network difficulty as of Mar 25, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The Innosilicon T3+ 52T holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AT2880 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Score: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T3+ 52T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-2.62/day compared to $-5.12/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Innosilicon T3+ 52T scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 36.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.

Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...

Compare Innosilicon T3+ 52T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.