Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 114.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Power Consumption | 3,306 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $77,478 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 128% more hashrate (260 vs 114 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AT2880's favour. The Whatsminer M50 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Whatsminer M50 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 128% more hashrate (260 vs 114 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M50 25% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,306 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 41% better efficiency (17.0 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 34% more heat output (15,081 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$1.34 | Daily net profit | -$3.87 |
| -$488 | Net after 1 year | -$4,012 |
| -$977 | Net after 2 years | -$5,425 |
| -$1,465 | Net after 3 years | -$6,837 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AT288017.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Whatsminer M50: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.34/day compared to $-3.87/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Whatsminer M50: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Whatsminer M50?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 12.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficiency (17.0 vs 29.0 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17