iBeLink BM-S3+ vs Goldshell HS3-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Specification | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 930.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 930 W |
| 136.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,173 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S3+
Goldshell HS3-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-S3+ edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 2588% more hashrate (25.0 vs 0.9 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell HS3-SE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-S3+ and Goldshell HS3-SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 2588% more hashrate (25.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 73% better power draw (3,400 vs 930 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 86% better efficiency (136 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 100% better weight (14.0 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 266% more heat output (11,601 vs 3,173 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Metric | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $3,299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,700 |
| -$7.27 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$5,954 | Net after 1 year | -$2,503 |
| -$8,609 | Net after 2 years | -$3,305 |
| -$11,264 | Net after 3 years | -$4,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3+136.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S3+ or Goldshell HS3-SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3-SE is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-7.27/day for the iBeLink BM-S3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-S3+ or the Goldshell HS3-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-S3+ vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS3-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S3+ and Goldshell HS3-SE on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 864.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (136 vs 1,000 J/TH).