Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink DM11G

iBeLink DM11G

Hashrate 10.8 GH/s Power 810 W Efficiency 75,000.0 J/TH
VS
FusionSilicon X7 Miner

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Hashrate 262.0 GH/s Power 1,420 W Efficiency 5,419.9 J/TH

iBeLink DM11G vs FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink DM11G Specification FusionSilicon X7 Miner
10.8 GH/s Hashrate 262.0 GH/s
810 W Power Consumption 1,420 W
75,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 5,419.9 J/TH
Noise Level
19,000.0 kg Weight 4,800.0 kg
2,764 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,845 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
iBeLink Manufacturer FusionSilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink DM11G

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.31
Yearly -$709.42

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Daily Revenue 0.00000012 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$3.41
Daily Profit -$3.40
Monthly -$101.96
Yearly -$1,240.48

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the FusionSilicon X7 Miner, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 2326% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s). The iBeLink DM11G claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: FusionSilicon X7 Miner — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink DM11G and FusionSilicon X7 Miner sit on each measurable spec:

  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 2326% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
  • iBeLink DM11G 43% better power draw (810 vs 1,420 W)
  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 93% better efficiency (75,000 vs 5,420 J/TH)
  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 75% better weight (19,000 vs 4,800 kg)
  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 75% more heat output (2,764 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 11% more home mining score (28.0 vs 31.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

5,419.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink DM11G or FusionSilicon X7 Miner more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM11G is more profitable at $-1.94/day compared to $-3.40/day for the FusionSilicon X7 Miner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iBeLink DM11G or the FusionSilicon X7 Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink DM11G or FusionSilicon X7 Miner?

The FusionSilicon X7 Miner scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM11G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink DM11G and FusionSilicon X7 Miner?

The iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH while the FusionSilicon X7 Miner runs at 5,419.9 J/TH — a difference of 69,580.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficiency (75,000 vs 5,420 J/TH).