Goldshell HS BOX II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 460.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 105.0 GH/s |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| 869.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,095.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2.0 kg | Weight | 450.0 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 392 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS BOX II
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS BOX II edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 338% more hashrate (0.5 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS BOX II's favour. That said, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell HS BOX II and Goldshell HS1-PLUS actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS BOX II 338% more hashrate (0.5 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 71% better power draw (400 vs 115 W)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 21% better efficiency (870 vs 1,095 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 100% better weight (2.0 vs 450.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 248% more heat output (1,365 vs 392 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 13% more home mining score (34.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell HS BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $325 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$0.94 | Daily net profit | -$0.27 |
| -$670 | Net after 1 year | -$999 |
| -$1,014 | Net after 2 years | -$1,099 |
| -$1,359 | Net after 3 years | -$1,198 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS BOX IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS BOX II869.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS BOX II or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-0.94/day for the Goldshell HS BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell HS BOX II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS BOX II or Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
The Goldshell HS BOX II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell HS1-PLUS). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell HS BOX II and Goldshell HS1-PLUS on J/TH?
The Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 225.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (870 vs 1,095 J/TH).