Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 930.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 TH/s |
| 930 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 7,300.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 3,173 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro II edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1405% more hashrate (0.9 vs 14.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS3-SE claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC5 Pro II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 1405% more hashrate (0.9 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 72% better power draw (930 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 76% better efficiency (1,000 vs 236 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 100% better weight (7,300.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 255% more heat output (3,173 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$2.20 | Daily net profit | -$7.42 |
| -$2,503 | Net after 1 year | -$3,340 |
| -$3,305 | Net after 2 years | -$6,050 |
| -$4,108 | Net after 3 years | -$8,759 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3-SEScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro II235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3-SE is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-7.42/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS3-SE scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC5 Pro II on J/TH?
The Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 764.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (1,000 vs 236 J/TH).