Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Hashrate 2,000.0 MH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 1,250,000.0 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X16-P

Jasminer X16-P

Hashrate 5.8 GH/s Power 1,900 W Efficiency 327,586.2 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-P

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro Specification Jasminer X16-P
2,000.0 MH/s Hashrate 5.8 GH/s
2,500 W Power Consumption 1,900 W
1,250,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 327,586.2 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
22.0 kg Weight 14.0 kg
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,483 BTU/hr
40/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$6.00
Monthly -$180.00
Yearly -$2,189.97

Jasminer X16-P

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$4.56
Daily Profit -$4.56
Monthly -$136.79
Yearly -$1,664.32

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-P comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 74% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 327,586 J/TH). That said, the Innosilicon A11 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Jasminer X16-P — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A11 Pro and Jasminer X16-P diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Jasminer X16-P 190% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X16-P 24% better power draw (2,500 vs 1,900 W)
  • Jasminer X16-P 74% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 327,586 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X16-P 36% better weight (22.0 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 32% more heat output (8,530 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 43% more home mining score (40.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro Metric Jasminer X16-P
$4,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,550
-$6.00 Daily net profit -$4.56
-$6,190 Net after 1 year -$4,214
-$8,380 Net after 2 years -$5,879
-$10,570 Net after 3 years -$7,543
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-P

327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-P: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-P is more profitable at $-4.56/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-P: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the Jasminer X16-P?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro and Jasminer X16-P?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 922,413.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 327,586 J/TH).