Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.6 GH/s |
| 620 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 861,111.1 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 13,000.0 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
iPollo V1
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-Q, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 80% better power draw (620 vs 3,100 W) in the Jasminer X16-Q's favour. The iPollo V1 holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 85% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 80% better power draw (620 vs 3,100 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 63% better efficiency (317,949 vs 861,111 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 100% better weight (10.0 vs 13,000.0 kg)
- iPollo V1 400% more heat output (2,115 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 195% more home mining score (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,699 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$4,043 | Net after 1 year | -$4,415 |
| -$4,586 | Net after 2 years | -$7,130 |
| -$5,129 | Net after 3 years | -$9,846 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V1?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH — a difference of 543,162.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (317,949 vs 861,111 J/TH).