Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

NerdQAxe++

NerdQAxe++

Hashrate 4.0 TH/s Power 120 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Hashrate 33.0 TH/s Power 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

NerdQAxe++ vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

NerdQAxe++ Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
4.0 TH/s Hashrate 33.0 TH/s
120 W Power Consumption 2,600 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 78.8 J/TH
42 dB Noise Level
0.5 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
409 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,871 BTU/hr
58/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

NerdQAxe++

Daily Revenue 0.00000184 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.15
Monthly -$4.39
Yearly -$53.41

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.17
Daily Electricity -$6.24
Daily Profit -$5.07
Monthly -$152.14
Yearly -$1,850.98

Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the NerdQAxe++ wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 95% better power draw (120 vs 2,600 W). The Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: NerdQAxe++ — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The NerdQAxe++ and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 725% more hashrate (4.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • NerdQAxe++ 95% better power draw (120 vs 2,600 W)
  • NerdQAxe++ 62% better efficiency (30.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
  • NerdQAxe++ 100% better weight (0.5 vs 10,000.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 2067% more heat output (409 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
  • NerdQAxe++ 164% more home mining score (58.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

NerdQAxe++ Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
$349 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.15 Daily net profit -$5.07
-$402 Net after 1 year -$1,851
-$456 Net after 2 years -$3,702
-$509 Net after 3 years -$5,553
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdQAxe++

Score: 58/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdQAxe++

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

NerdQAxe++ vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe++ is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-5.07/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the NerdQAxe++ or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

NerdQAxe++ vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?

The NerdQAxe++ scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the NerdQAxe++ and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?

The NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 48.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (30.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).