iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V2X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 GH/s |
| 1,240 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 137,500.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 1.7 kg |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 563 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
iPollo V2X
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V2X comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 87% better power draw (1,240 vs 165 W) in the iPollo V2X's favour. The iPollo V1 Classic claws back ground on price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V2X diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 Classic 29% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 87% better power draw (1,240 vs 165 W)
- iPollo V2X 83% better efficiency (800,000 vs 137,500 J/TH)
- iPollo V2X 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 1.7 kg)
- iPollo V1 Classic 651% more heat output (4,231 vs 563 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2X 97% more home mining score (31.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $990 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$1,135 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$1,279 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$1,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2XScore: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V2X: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Classic or the iPollo V2X better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Classic at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Classic or iPollo V2X?
The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V2X?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 662,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (800,000 vs 137,500 J/TH).