Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo G1 Mini

iPollo G1 Mini

Hashrate 1.2 GH/s Power 120 W Efficiency 100,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2X

iPollo V2X

Hashrate 1.2 GH/s Power 165 W Efficiency 137,500.0 J/TH

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V2X

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Mini Specification iPollo V2X
1.2 GH/s Hashrate 1.2 GH/s
120 W Power Consumption 165 W
100,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 137,500.0 J/TH
Noise Level 55 dB
2.9 kg Weight 1.7 kg
409 BTU/hr BTU Output 563 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 61/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.29
Monthly -$8.64
Yearly -$105.10

iPollo V2X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.40
Daily Profit -$0.40
Monthly -$11.88
Yearly -$144.52

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo G1 Mini wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 27% better efficiency (100,000 vs 137,500 J/TH) in the iPollo G1 Mini's favour. The iPollo V2X claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo G1 Mini — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo G1 Mini and iPollo V2X sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo G1 Mini 27% better power draw (120 vs 165 W)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 27% better efficiency (100,000 vs 137,500 J/TH)
  • iPollo V2X 40% better weight (2.9 vs 1.7 kg)
  • iPollo V2X 38% more heat output (409 vs 563 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2X 103% more home mining score (30.0 vs 61.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo G1 Mini Metric iPollo V2X
$277 Upfront cost (MSRP) $990
-$0.29 Daily net profit -$0.40
-$382 Net after 1 year -$1,135
-$487 Net after 2 years -$1,279
-$592 Net after 3 years -$1,424
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2X

Score: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1 Mini

100,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V2X: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo G1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.29/day compared to $-0.40/day for the iPollo V2X. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V2X: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iPollo G1 Mini at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo G1 Mini or the iPollo V2X?

The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo G1 Mini). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo G1 Mini and iPollo V2X?

The iPollo G1 Mini runs at 100,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 37,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (100,000 vs 137,500 J/TH).