Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 620 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 72% better power draw (2,200 vs 620 W). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X16-Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer E9 Pro 89% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 72% better power draw (2,200 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 47% better efficacité (597,826 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Jasminer X16-Q 30% better weight (14.2 vs 10.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 255% more heat output (7,506 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 63% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$4,043 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$4,586 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$5,129 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X16-Q on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 279,877.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (597,826 vs 317,949 J/TH).