Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer E9 Pro

Antminer E9 Pro

Taux de hachage 3,680.0 MH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 597,826.1 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini

iPollo V1 Mini

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer E9 Pro Specification iPollo V1 Mini
3,680.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
2,200 W Consommation électrique 240 W
597,826.1 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
14.2 kg Weight 2.1 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
40/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
Bitmain Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer E9 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$5.28
Monthly -$158.40
Yearly -$1,927.16

iPollo V1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer E9 Pro, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1127% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer E9 Pro — l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer E9 Pro 1127% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 89% better power draw (2,200 vs 240 W)
  • Antminer E9 Pro 25% better efficacité (597,826 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 85% better weight (14.2 vs 2.1 kg)
  • Antminer E9 Pro 817% more heat output (7,506 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer E9 Pro 29% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer E9 Pro Metric iPollo V1 Mini
$3,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $300
-$5.28 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$4,927 Net after 1 year -$510
-$6,854 Net after 2 years -$720
-$8,781 Net after 3 years -$931
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer E9 Pro

Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer E9 Pro

597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini?

The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini?

The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 202,173.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficacité (597,826 vs 800,000 J/TH).