Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V2X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 GH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 165 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 137,500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 1.7 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 563 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V2X
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V2X l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 93% better power draw (2,200 vs 165 W). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V2X diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer E9 Pro 207% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 93% better power draw (2,200 vs 165 W)
- iPollo V2X 77% better efficacité (597,826 vs 137,500 J/TH)
- iPollo V2X 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- iPollo V2X 88% better weight (14.2 vs 1.7 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 1233% more heat output (7,506 vs 563 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2X 53% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $990 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,135 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,279 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$1,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2XScore: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V2X more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V2X: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V2X?
The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V2X?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 460,326.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (597,826 vs 137,500 J/TH).