Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer S17 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer S17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 56.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 2,212 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 39.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,547 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Antminer S17 Pro
Based on BTC price of $63,282 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer S17 Pro l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 300% more hashrate (14.0 vs 56.0 TH/s) in the Antminer S17 Pro's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer S17 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S17 Pro 300% more hashrate (14.0 vs 56.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 39% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,212 W)
- Antminer S17 Pro 59% better efficacité (96.4 vs 39.5 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 37% better weight (6.0 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer S17 Pro 64% more heat output (4,606 vs 7,547 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 Pro 42% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer S17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.84 | Daily net profit | -$3.71 |
| -$1,385 | Net after 1 year | -$1,353 |
| -$2,422 | Net after 2 years | -$2,705 |
| -$3,458 | Net after 3 years | -$4,058 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17 ProScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17 Pro39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer S17 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.84/day compared to $-3.71/day for the Antminer S17 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Antminer S17 Pro?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer S17 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Antminer S17 Pro?
The Antminer S17 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer S17 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH — a difference of 56.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (96.4 vs 39.5 J/TH).