Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S17 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S17 Pro is the stronger pick — it leads on 2 of 3 head-to-head factors. The Antminer E9 Pro runs 3,680.0 MH/s; the Antminer S17 Pro runs 56.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer S17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 56.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,212 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 39.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,547 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 11/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer S17 Pro
Based on BTC price of $64,804 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S17 Pro comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1521639% more hashrate (0.0 vs 56.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S17 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S17 Pro 1521639% more hashrate (0.0 vs 56.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 1% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,212 W)
- Antminer S17 Pro 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 39.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 Pro 33% better weight (14.2 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer S17 Pro 1% more heat output (7,506 vs 7,547 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer S17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$3.48 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,271 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,542 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$3,814 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17 Pro39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer S17 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 Pro is more profitable at $-3.48/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Antminer S17 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S17 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S17 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH — a difference of 597,786.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 39.5 J/TH).