Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S17 Pro is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Antminer AL1 runs 16.0 TH/s; the Antminer S17 Pro runs 56.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Antminer S17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 56.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,212 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 39.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,547 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 11/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Antminer S17 Pro
Based on BTC price of $64,699 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S17 Pro, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 81% better efficacité (210.0 vs 39.5 J/TH) in the Antminer S17 Pro's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Antminer S17 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S17 Pro 250% more hashrate (16.0 vs 56.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 Pro 34% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,212 W)
- Antminer S17 Pro 81% better efficacité (210.0 vs 39.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 Pro 34% better weight (14.5 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer AL1 52% more heat output (11,464 vs 7,547 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 Pro 38% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 11.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Antminer S17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.54 | Daily net profit | -$3.49 |
| -$12,753 | Net after 1 year | -$1,272 |
| -$15,506 | Net after 2 years | -$2,545 |
| -$18,260 | Net after 3 years | -$3,817 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17 ProScore: 11/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17 Pro39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Antminer S17 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 Pro is more profitable at $-3.49/day compared to $-7.54/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Antminer S17 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S17 Pro scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH — a difference of 170.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (210.0 vs 39.5 J/TH).