Antminer S19 XP vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 1,674 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $62,634 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon Q l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 44% better power draw (3,010 vs 1,674 W). That said, the Antminer S19 XP isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 XP and Canaan Avalon Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 XP 56% more hashrate (140.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 44% better power draw (3,010 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 13% better efficacité (21.5 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Q 27% better weight (14.4 vs 10.5 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP 80% more heat output (10,270 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP 50% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer S19 XP | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| $4,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$3.26 | Daily net profit | -$1.47 |
| -$5,689 | Net after 1 year | -$1,827 |
| -$6,878 | Net after 2 years | -$2,363 |
| -$8,066 | Net after 3 years | -$2,898 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XPScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 XP vs Canaan Avalon Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-1.47/day compared to $-3.26/day for the Antminer S19 XP. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S19 XP vs Canaan Avalon Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer S19 XP at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 XP or the Canaan Avalon Q?
The Antminer S19 XP scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Canaan Avalon Q). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S19 XP vs Canaan Avalon Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S19 XP runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 2.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (21.5 vs 18.6 J/TH).