Antminer S19k Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19k Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 120.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.5 TH/s |
| 2,760 W | Consommation électrique | 1,310 W |
| 23.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 97.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 4.2 kg |
| 9,417 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,470 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19k Pro
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer S19k Pro l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 789% more hashrate (120.0 vs 13.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S19k Pro and Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19k Pro 789% more hashrate (120.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 53% better power draw (2,760 vs 1,310 W)
- Antminer S19k Pro 76% better efficacité (23.0 vs 97.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 66% better weight (12.5 vs 4.2 kg)
- Antminer S19k Pro 111% more heat output (9,417 vs 4,470 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19k Pro 171% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19k Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $600 |
| -$3.20 | Daily net profit | -$2.76 |
| -$3,970 | Net after 1 year | -$1,607 |
| -$5,140 | Net after 2 years | -$2,614 |
| -$6,309 | Net after 3 years | -$3,621 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19k ProScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19k Pro23.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19k Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.76/day compared to $-3.20/day for the Antminer S19k Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19k Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S19k Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19k Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)?
The Antminer S19k Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19k Pro and Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)?
The Antminer S19k Pro runs at 23.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) runs at 97.0 J/TH — a difference of 74.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (23.0 vs 97.0 J/TH).