Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19k Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S19k Pro is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Antminer E9 Pro runs 3,680.0 MH/s; the Antminer S19k Pro runs 120.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer S19k Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 120.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,760 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,417 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer S19k Pro
Based on BTC price of $64,877 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19k Pro comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 3260770% more hashrate (0.0 vs 120.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S19k Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19k Pro 3260770% more hashrate (0.0 vs 120.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 20% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,760 W)
- Antminer S19k Pro 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 23.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S19k Pro 12% better weight (14.2 vs 12.5 kg)
- Antminer S19k Pro 25% more heat output (7,506 vs 9,417 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer S19k Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,800 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$2.71 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$3,788 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$4,776 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$5,764 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 11/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19k Pro23.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Antminer S19k Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19k Pro is more profitable at $-2.71/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19k Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer S19k Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer S19k Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19k Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer S19k Pro runs at 23.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,803.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 23.0 J/TH).