Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Avalon A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Avalon A1366
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1366, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 983% more hashrate (12.0 vs 130.0 TH/s). The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Avalon A1366 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1366 983% more hashrate (12.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 66% better power draw (1,100 vs 3,250 W)
- Avalon A1366 73% better efficacité (91.7 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 72% better weight (3.5 vs 12.6 kg)
- Avalon A1366 195% more heat output (3,753 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 44% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$2.29 | Daily net profit | -$4.04 |
| -$1,187 | Net after 1 year | -$4,976 |
| -$2,024 | Net after 2 years | -$6,452 |
| -$2,861 | Net after 3 years | -$7,928 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Avalon A1366?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.29/day compared to $-4.04/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Avalon A1366 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Avalon A1366 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Avalon A1366: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Avalon A1366?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (91.7 vs 25.0 J/TH).