Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1246

Avalon A1246

Taux de hachage 90.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 39T

Innosilicon T3 39T

Taux de hachage 39.0 TH/s Puissance 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH

Avalon A1246 vs Innosilicon T3 39T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1246 Specification Innosilicon T3 39T
90.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 39.0 TH/s
3,420 W Consommation électrique 2,150 W
38.0 J/TH Efficiency 55.1 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.3 kg Weight 8.7 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,336 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1246

Daily Revenue 0.00004072 BTC $2.61
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$5.60
Monthly -$168.06
Yearly -$2,044.78

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001764 BTC $1.13
Daily Electricity -$5.16
Daily Profit -$4.03
Monthly -$120.92
Yearly -$1,471.24

Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1246, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 131% more hashrate (90.0 vs 39.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1246's favour. The Innosilicon T3 39T holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1246 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and Innosilicon T3 39T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1246 131% more hashrate (90.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 37% better power draw (3,420 vs 2,150 W)
  • Avalon A1246 31% better efficacité (38.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 29% better weight (12.3 vs 8.7 kg)
  • Avalon A1246 59% more heat output (11,669 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1246 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1246 Metric Innosilicon T3 39T
$1,800 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.60 Daily net profit -$4.03
-$3,845 Net after 1 year -$1,471
-$5,890 Net after 2 years -$2,942
-$7,934 Net after 3 years -$4,414
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1246

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1246

38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1246 vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T3 39T is more profitable at $-4.03/day compared to $-5.60/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 39T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1246 or Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1246 vs Innosilicon T3 39T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 17.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (38.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).