Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 58.0 TH/s |
| 5,644 W | Power Consumption | 3,000 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 12,700.0 kg |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 472% more hashrate (332.0 vs 58.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)'s favour. The iPollo B1L holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and iPollo B1L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 472% more hashrate (332.0 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- iPollo B1L 47% better power draw (5,644 vs 3,000 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 67% better efficiency (17.0 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 100% better weight (12.8 vs 12,700.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 88% more heat output (19,257 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 100% more home mining score (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$1.65 | Daily net profit | -$5.12 |
| -$2,401 | Net after 1 year | -$2,299 |
| -$3,003 | Net after 2 years | -$4,169 |
| -$3,605 | Net after 3 years | -$6,038 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)Score: 44/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or iPollo B1L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is more profitable at $-1.65/day compared to $-5.12/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or iPollo B1L?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs iPollo B1L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and iPollo B1L on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 34.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficiency (17.0 vs 51.7 J/TH).