Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Power Consumption | 2,600 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 78.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,871 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 106% more hashrate (16.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 106% more hashrate (16.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 51% better power draw (1,280 vs 2,600 W)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 2% better efficiency (80.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 54% better weight (4,560 vs 10,000 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 103% more heat output (4,367 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+78.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.51/day compared to $-5.07/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 1.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (80.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).
Compare Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator