Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 88.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 58.0 TH/s |
| 3,344 W | Power Consumption | 3,000 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 12,700.0 kg |
| 11,410 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $77,950 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 52% more hashrate (88.0 vs 58.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo B1L isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and iPollo B1L actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 52% more hashrate (88.0 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- iPollo B1L 10% better power draw (3,344 vs 3,000 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 27% better efficiency (38.0 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- iPollo B1L 11% better weight (14,200 vs 12,700 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 11% more heat output (11,410 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| $596 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$4.87 | Daily net profit | -$5.12 |
| -$2,373 | Net after 1 year | -$2,299 |
| -$4,150 | Net after 2 years | -$4,167 |
| -$5,927 | Net after 3 years | -$6,036 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or iPollo B1L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) is more profitable at $-4.87/day compared to $-5.12/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or the iPollo B1L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or iPollo B1L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and iPollo B1L on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 13.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (38.0 vs 51.7 J/TH).