Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Hashrate 262.0 TH/s Power 3,275 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+
260.0 TH/s Hashrate 262.0 TH/s
4,420 W Power Consumption 3,275 W
17.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 13.5 kg
15,081 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,174 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011965 BTC $9.27
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$1.34
Monthly -$40.14
Yearly -$488.35

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Daily Revenue 0.00012057 BTC $9.34
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit $1.48
Monthly $44.44
Yearly $540.70

Based on BTC price of $77,478 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 26% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.5 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 1% more hashrate (260 vs 262 TH/s)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 26% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,275 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 26% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 35% more heat output (15,081 vs 11,174 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

$2.82/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is more profitable at $1.48/day compared to $-1.34/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: which fits a residential setup better?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ on J/TH?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 4.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).