Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink BM-N3 Max

iBeLink BM-N3 Max

Hashrate 30.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 110.0 J/TH
VS
Bitmain CK6-SE

Bitmain CK6-SE

Hashrate 17.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 194.1 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Bitmain CK6-SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N3 Max Specification Bitmain CK6-SE
30.0 TH/s Hashrate 17.0 TH/s
3,300 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
110.0 J/TH Efficiency 194.1 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 80 dB
6.6 kg Weight 11.5 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 29/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N3 Max

Daily Revenue 0.00001381 BTC $1.08
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$6.84
Monthly -$205.19
Yearly -$2,496.46

Bitmain CK6-SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000782 BTC $0.61
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.31
Monthly -$219.23
Yearly -$2,667.34

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-N3 Max edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 43% better efficiency (110 vs 194 J/TH) in the iBeLink BM-N3 Max's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink BM-N3 Max — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Bitmain CK6-SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iBeLink BM-N3 Max 76% more hashrate (30.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink BM-N3 Max 43% better efficiency (110 vs 194 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-N3 Max 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
  • iBeLink BM-N3 Max 43% better weight (6.6 vs 11.5 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-N3 Max 24% more home mining score (36.0 vs 29.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink BM-N3 Max

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-N3 Max

110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max is more profitable at $-6.84/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iBeLink BM-N3 Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain CK6-SE at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which fits a residential setup better?

The iBeLink BM-N3 Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Bitmain CK6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Bitmain CK6-SE on J/TH?

The iBeLink BM-N3 Max runs at 110.0 J/TH while the Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 84.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (110 vs 194 J/TH).