Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 930.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 GH/s |
| 930 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 7,300.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 3,173 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC-BOX edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 78% better power draw (930 vs 200 W). The Goldshell HS3-SE claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS3-SE 3% more hashrate (0.9 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 78% better power draw (930 vs 200 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 78% better efficiency (1,000 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 73% better weight (7,300 vs 2,000 kg)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 365% more heat output (3,173 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 6% more home mining score (31.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$2.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$2,503 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$3,305 | Net after 2 years | -$626 |
| -$4,108 | Net after 3 years | -$790 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC-BOXScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-2.20/day for the Goldshell HS3-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell HS3-SE or the Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell SC-BOX scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS3-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 777.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficiency (1,000 vs 222 J/TH).