Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3 | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 17.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 7,000.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC6 SE, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 750% more hashrate (2.0 vs 17.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS3 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell SC6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC6 SE 750% more hashrate (2.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3 39% better power draw (2,000 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 81% better efficiency (1,000 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3 39% better weight (7,000 vs 11,500 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 65% more heat output (6,824 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3 27% more home mining score (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS3 | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$4.73 | Daily net profit | -$7.32 |
| -$2,826 | Net after 1 year | -$3,700 |
| -$4,552 | Net after 2 years | -$6,371 |
| -$6,278 | Net after 3 years | -$9,042 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC6 SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3 is more profitable at $-4.73/day compared to $-7.32/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC6 SE?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell HS3 or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell HS3 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 805.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (1,000 vs 194 J/TH).