Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Antminer E9 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 3,680.0 MH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 597,826.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Antminer E9 Pro
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer E9 Pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 62% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 597,826 J/TH). The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Antminer E9 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer E9 Pro 145% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 6% better power draw (2,350 vs 2,200 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 62% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 597,826 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 7% more heat output (8,018 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 54% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$4,927 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$6,854 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$8,781 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Antminer E9 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Antminer E9 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Antminer E9 Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Antminer E9 Pro?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH — a difference of 968,840.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 597,826 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster