Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 888,888.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 8.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V1 Hyd
Based on BTC price of $64,089 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer E9 Pro, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 309% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Hyd sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer E9 Pro 309% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 64% better power draw (2,200 vs 800 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 33% better efficacité (597,826 vs 888,889 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 44% better weight (14.2 vs 8.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 175% more heat output (7,506 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 33% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $489 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.92 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,190 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,891 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$2,591 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1 Hyd?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1 Hyd?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Hyd at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1 Hyd?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Hyd on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 291,062.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (597,826 vs 888,889 J/TH).