Avalon A1246 vs FluMiner T3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1246 | Specification | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 115.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 1,700 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1246
FluMiner T3
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the FluMiner T3, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 61% better efficacité (38.0 vs 14.8 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and FluMiner T3 sit on each measurable spec:
- FluMiner T3 28% more hashrate (90.0 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- FluMiner T3 50% better power draw (3,420 vs 1,700 W)
- FluMiner T3 61% better efficacité (38.0 vs 14.8 J/TH)
- FluMiner T3 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Avalon A1246 2% better weight (12.3 vs 12.6 kg)
- Avalon A1246 101% more heat output (11,669 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner T3 56% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1246 | Metric | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,601 |
| -$5.65 | Daily net profit | -$0.81 |
| -$3,862 | Net after 1 year | -$1,897 |
| -$5,925 | Net after 2 years | -$2,193 |
| -$7,987 | Net after 3 years | -$2,489 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner T3Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner T314.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1246 or FluMiner T3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $-0.81/day compared to $-5.65/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or FluMiner T3?
The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Avalon A1246 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1246 or FluMiner T3?
The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1246). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1246 and FluMiner T3?
The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 23.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (38.0 vs 14.8 J/TH).