Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V2X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 GH/s |
| 2,340 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 137,500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 1.7 kg |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 563 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
iPollo V2X
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V2X comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 93% better power draw (2,340 vs 165 W) in the iPollo V2X's favour. The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and iPollo V2X sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 650% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 93% better power draw (2,340 vs 165 W)
- iPollo V2X 47% better efficiency (260,000 vs 137,500 J/TH)
- iPollo V2X 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- iPollo V2X 88% better weight (14.2 vs 1.7 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 1318% more heat output (7,984 vs 563 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2X 53% more home mining score (40.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $990 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$1,135 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$1,279 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$1,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2XScore: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or iPollo V2X more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the iPollo V2X better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the iPollo V2X?
The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and iPollo V2X on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 122,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficiency (260,000 vs 137,500 J/TH).