Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell HS3-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3 | Specification | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 930.0 GH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 930 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 7,000.0 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,173 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3
Goldshell HS3-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,855 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell HS3-SE finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell HS3-SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS3 115% more hashrate (2.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 54% better power draw (2,000 vs 930 W)
- Goldshell HS3 4% better weight (7,000 vs 7,300 kg)
- Goldshell HS3 115% more heat output (6,824 vs 3,173 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 11% more home mining score (28.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS3 | Metric | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,700 |
| -$4.73 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$2,826 | Net after 1 year | -$2,503 |
| -$4,552 | Net after 2 years | -$3,305 |
| -$6,279 | Net after 3 years | -$4,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3-SEScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell HS3-SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3-SE is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell HS3 or the Goldshell HS3-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS3-SE scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell HS3-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.