Antminer S17 Pro vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 Pro | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 2,212 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 7,547 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17 Pro
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M60S edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 232% more hashrate (56.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). The Antminer S17 Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S17 Pro and Whatsminer M60S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60S 232% more hashrate (56.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 Pro 36% better power draw (2,212 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 53% better efficacité (39.5 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 Pro 32% better weight (9.5 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 57% more heat output (7,547 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 Pro 133% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer S17 Pro | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.71 | Daily net profit | -$3.04 |
| -$1,354 | Net after 1 year | -$6,611 |
| -$2,709 | Net after 2 years | -$7,721 |
| -$4,063 | Net after 3 years | -$8,832 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17 ProScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S17 Pro vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-3.04/day compared to $-3.71/day for the Antminer S17 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S17 Pro or the Whatsminer M60S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17 Pro or the Whatsminer M60S?
The Antminer S17 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M60S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S17 Pro and Whatsminer M60S?
The Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 20.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (39.5 vs 18.7 J/TH).