Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer S9

Antminer S9

Taux de hachage 14.0 TH/s Puissance 1,350 W Efficiency 96.4 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Taux de hachage 262.0 TH/s Puissance 3,799 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

Antminer S9 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S9 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
14.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 262.0 TH/s
1,350 W Consommation électrique 3,799 W
96.4 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
76 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
4.2 kg Weight 25.5 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,962 BTU/hr
83/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S9

Daily Revenue 0.00000633 BTC $0.40
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$2.84
Monthly -$85.23
Yearly -$1,037.00

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Daily Revenue 0.00011853 BTC $7.47
Daily Electricity -$9.12
Daily Profit -$1.65
Monthly -$49.58
Yearly -$603.18

Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 1771% more hashrate (14.0 vs 262.0 TH/s). The Antminer S9 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S9 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 1771% more hashrate (14.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S9 64% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,799 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 85% better efficacité (96.4 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Antminer S9 84% better weight (4.2 vs 25.5 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 181% more heat output (4,606 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S9 177% more score de minage domestique (83.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S9

Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer S9 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $-1.65/day compared to $-2.84/day for the Antminer S9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S9 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer S9 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S9 scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S9 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?

The Antminer S9 runs at 96.4 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 81.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (96.4 vs 14.5 J/TH).