Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Hashrate 750.0 MH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 1,800,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2X

iPollo V2X

Hashrate 1.2 GH/s Power 165 W Efficiency 137,500.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V2X

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Specification iPollo V2X
750.0 MH/s Hashrate 1.2 GH/s
1,350 W Power Consumption 165 W
1,800,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 137,500.0 J/TH
Noise Level 55 dB
8,100.0 kg Weight 1.7 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 563 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 61/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.24
Monthly -$97.20
Yearly -$1,182.59

iPollo V2X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.40
Daily Profit -$0.40
Monthly -$11.88
Yearly -$144.52

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V2X comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 92% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 137,500 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo V2X — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo V2X sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo V2X 60% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V2X 88% better power draw (1,350 vs 165 W)
  • iPollo V2X 92% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 137,500 J/TH)
  • iPollo V2X 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 1.7 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 718% more heat output (4,606 vs 563 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2X 97% more home mining score (31.0 vs 61.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Metric iPollo V2X
$800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $990
-$3.24 Daily net profit -$0.40
-$1,983 Net after 1 year -$1,135
-$3,165 Net after 2 years -$1,279
-$4,348 Net after 3 years -$1,424
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2X

Score: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2X

137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V2X more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V2X: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the iPollo V2X?

The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo V2X?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,662,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 137,500 J/TH).