Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A16XP

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Hashrate 300.0 TH/s Power 3,850 W Efficiency 12.8 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 Specification Canaan Avalon A16XP
260.0 TH/s Hashrate 300.0 TH/s
4,420 W Power Consumption 3,850 W
17.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 14.9 kg
15,081 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,136 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011965 BTC $9.27
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$1.34
Monthly -$40.14
Yearly -$488.35

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Daily Revenue 0.00013805 BTC $10.70
Daily Electricity -$9.24
Daily Profit $1.46
Monthly $43.69
Yearly $531.52

Based on BTC price of $77,478 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16XP comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). The standout gap is 25% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.8 J/TH) in the Canaan Avalon A16XP's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A16XP — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Canaan Avalon A16XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 15% more hashrate (260 vs 300 TH/s)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 13% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,850 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 25% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.8 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 15% more heat output (15,081 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 Metric Canaan Avalon A16XP
Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,280
-$1.34 Daily net profit $1.46
-$488 Net after 1 year -$3,748
-$977 Net after 2 years -$3,217
-$1,465 Net after 3 years -$2,685
Payback period Takes ~8.1 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Canaan Avalon A16XP

$2.79/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A16XP

12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.46/day compared to $-1.34/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Canaan Avalon A16XP better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which fits a residential setup better?

The Canaan Avalon A16XP scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 4.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.8 J/TH).