Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer T21

Antminer T21

Hashrate 190.0 TH/s Power 3,610 W Efficiency 19.0 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer T21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Antminer T21
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 190.0 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 3,610 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 19.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 14.6 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,317 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.49
Monthly -$224.65
Yearly -$2,733.27

Antminer T21

Daily Revenue 0.00008743 BTC $6.84
Daily Electricity -$8.66
Daily Profit -$1.83
Monthly -$54.86
Yearly -$667.51

Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer T21, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1088% more hashrate (16.0 vs 190.0 TH/s). The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer T21 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Antminer T21 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer T21 1088% more hashrate (16.0 vs 190.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer AL1 7% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,610 W)
  • Antminer T21 91% better efficiency (210.0 vs 19.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer AL1 1% better weight (14.5 vs 14.6 kg)
  • Antminer T21 7% more heat output (11,464 vs 12,317 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer AL1 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer AL1 Metric Antminer T21
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,200
-$7.49 Daily net profit -$1.83
-$12,733 Net after 1 year -$4,868
-$15,467 Net after 2 years -$5,535
-$18,200 Net after 3 years -$6,203
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer AL1

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T21

19.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer AL1 or Antminer T21 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T21 is more profitable at $-1.83/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer T21: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Antminer T21?

The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Antminer T21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Antminer T21?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer T21 runs at 19.0 J/TH — a difference of 191.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (210.0 vs 19.0 J/TH).