Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer D9

Antminer D9

Hashrate 1,770.0 GH/s Power 2,839 W Efficiency 1,604.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer T21

Antminer T21

Hashrate 190.0 TH/s Power 3,610 W Efficiency 19.0 J/TH

Antminer D9 vs Antminer T21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D9 Specification Antminer T21
1,770.0 GH/s Hashrate 190.0 TH/s
2,839 W Power Consumption 3,610 W
1,604.0 J/TH Efficiency 19.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
16.1 kg Weight 14.6 kg
9,687 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,317 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D9

Daily Revenue 0.00000081 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$6.81
Daily Profit -$6.75
Monthly -$202.50
Yearly -$2,463.71

Antminer T21

Daily Revenue 0.00008743 BTC $6.84
Daily Electricity -$8.66
Daily Profit -$1.83
Monthly -$54.77
Yearly -$666.39

Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T21 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 10634% more hashrate (1.8 vs 190.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer T21 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Antminer T21 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer T21 10634% more hashrate (1.8 vs 190.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer D9 21% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,610 W)
  • Antminer T21 99% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 19.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer T21 9% better weight (16.1 vs 14.6 kg)
  • Antminer T21 27% more heat output (9,687 vs 12,317 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer D9 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer D9 Metric Antminer T21
$3,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,200
-$6.75 Daily net profit -$1.83
-$5,464 Net after 1 year -$4,866
-$7,927 Net after 2 years -$5,533
-$10,391 Net after 3 years -$6,199
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer D9

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T21

19.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer D9 or Antminer T21 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T21 is more profitable at $-1.83/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer D9 or the Antminer T21 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer D9 vs Antminer T21: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Antminer T21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer D9 vs Antminer T21: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Antminer T21 runs at 19.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,585.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 19.0 J/TH).