Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) vs Antminer KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) | Specification | Antminer KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 190.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 9.4 TH/s |
| 760 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 4,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 372.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 16.1 kg |
| 2,593 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh)
Antminer KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS3 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 4947268% more hashrate (0.0 vs 9.4 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) and Antminer KS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer KS3 4947268% more hashrate (0.0 vs 9.4 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) 78% better power draw (760 vs 3,500 W)
- Antminer KS3 100% better efficiency (4,000,000 vs 372 J/TH)
- Antminer KS3 100% better weight (10,500.0 vs 16.1 kg)
- Antminer KS3 361% more heat output (2,593 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 20% more home mining score (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) | Metric | Antminer KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,000 |
| -$1.82 | Daily net profit | -$8.06 |
| -$666 | Net after 1 year | -$10,943 |
| -$1,332 | Net after 2 years | -$13,885 |
| -$1,997 | Net after 3 years | -$16,828 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS3372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) or the Antminer KS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) is more profitable at $-1.82/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) or the Antminer KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) vs Antminer KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) and Antminer KS3?
The Bitmain Antminer E3 (190Mh) runs at 4,000,000.0 J/TH while the Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH — a difference of 3,999,627.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (4,000,000 vs 372 J/TH).