Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 504.0 MH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 800 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,587,301.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 2777678% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)'s favour. The Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition holds the edge in power consumption and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 2777678% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition 41% better power draw (1,350 vs 800 W)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better efficiency (96.4 vs 1,587,301.6 J/TH)
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition 9% better noise (55.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 40% better weight (6.0 vs 10.0 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 69% more heat output (4,606 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 2% more home mining score (59.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$1.92 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,200 |
| -$2,347 | Net after 2 years | -$1,901 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$2,601 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)96.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 58/100 for the Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH — a difference of 1,587,205.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (96.4 vs 1,587,301.6 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Loki Edition (S9) with...
Compare Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition with...
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition vs Bitaxe Gamma