iPollo V2X vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2X | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 GH/s | Hashrate | 5.8 GH/s |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 1,900 W |
| 137,500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 1.7 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 563 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 61/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2X
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2X wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better power draw (165 vs 1,900 W). That said, the Jasminer X16-P isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V2X and Jasminer X16-P actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X16-P 383% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 91% better power draw (165 vs 1,900 W)
- iPollo V2X 58% better efficiency (137,500 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- iPollo V2X 88% better weight (1.7 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 1051% more heat output (563 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2X 118% more home mining score (61.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V2X | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $990 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$0.40 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$1,135 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$1,279 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$1,424 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2XScore: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V2X or the Jasminer X16-P?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V2X or Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iPollo V2X vs Jasminer X16-P: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V2X and Jasminer X16-P on J/TH?
The iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 190,086.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (137,500 vs 327,586 J/TH).