iPollo V2X vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2X | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 GH/s | Hashrate | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 620 W |
| 137,500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 1.7 kg | Weight | — |
| 563 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 61/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2X
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V2X, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption). The standout gap is 73% better power draw (165 vs 620 W) in the iPollo V2X's favour. That said, the Jasminer X16-Q isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V2X and Jasminer X16-Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 63% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 73% better power draw (165 vs 620 W)
- iPollo V2X 57% better efficiency (137,500 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 27% better noise (55.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Jasminer X16-Q 276% more heat output (563 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 7% more home mining score (61.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V2X | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $990 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$0.40 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$1,135 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$1,279 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$1,424 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V2X or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V2X vs Jasminer X16-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2X at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2X or Jasminer X16-Q?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 61/100 for the iPollo V2X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V2X and Jasminer X16-Q on J/TH?
The iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 180,448.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficiency (137,500 vs 317,949 J/TH).