Skip to content

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Flared Gas Bitcoin Mining Capacity by Basin

The world flares roughly 16,000 million cubic feet of natural gas every day — burned off at the wellhead as waste. This dataset asks a physical question with a stark answer: how much Bitcoin mining capacity is latent in that wasted gas? For each major oil-and-gas basin it pairs the reported (or satellite-observed) flared volume with the theoretical generation and hashrate it could power.

The energy-sovereignty case for Bitcoin mining rests on exactly this: mining is the only buyer that will follow stranded, wasted energy to the wellhead and turn it into something valuable. Flared gas is the clearest example — methane that would otherwise be vented or burned for nothing.

Read the numbers honestly. Flaring is not cleanly reported per basin, and satellite-observed volumes usually differ from operator-reported ones — so every row states its methodology, year and confidence, and shows the reported-vs-satellite gap. The mining-capacity figures are a theoretical maximum: they assume 100% of flared gas is captured and converted, which no basin comes close to in practice. Treat them as a ceiling on the opportunity, not a forecast.

Quick answer

The world flared about 16,159 MMcf of natural gas per day in 2025 (World Bank / satellite data). If every cubic foot were captured and burned in a generator to mine Bitcoin, it would run roughly 64.6 GW of power and about 3,232 EH/s of hashrate — on the order of 3.2x the entire ~1,000 EH/s Bitcoin network. This dataset gives the same figures per basin, with the flared volume source-cited and the mining capacity clearly marked as a theoretical maximum.

This is the physical case for stranded-gas and flare mining, and for energy sovereignty: wasted, vented methane is a vast latent power source. It is a ceiling, not a forecast — real capture is a small fraction, because flaring is scattered across thousands of intermittent wells.

Download CSV Download JSON REST API →

Permian Basin West Texas + SE New Mexico, USA Medium confidence
266.0MMcf/day flared (2023)
1,064MW addressable*
53.2EH/s addressable*

Methodology: Regulator-reported (Texas RRC assessment, Permian-scoped). Source: Texas Railroad Commission assessment (Permian-scoped, 12 months to ~mid-2023), reported by Bloomberg

Reported vs satellite: Satellite (NOAA VIIRS) runs roughly 2x higher; RMI's analysis of TX operator data (12 mo to Nov 2024) plus unreported VIIRS flaring implies up to ~600 MMcf/d Texas-wide. EIA's Texas+New Mexico vented+flared total was ~495 MMcf/d in 2024, but that over-counts (Texas total includes Eagle Ford and other basins).

The Permian spans two states and is not published as a standalone flaring number; ~266 MMcf/d is the cleanest Permian-scoped flared figure. The single most-flared US basin.

Bakken / Williston Basin North Dakota, USA High confidence
136.5MMcf/day flared (2026)
546MW addressable*
27.3EH/s addressable*

Methodology: Regulator-reported (North Dakota DMR Director's Cut). Source: North Dakota Dept. of Mineral Resources (DMR) Director's Cut, Feb 2026 production

Reported vs satellite: Reported (operator volumes to the state). No current basin-level VIIRS figure is published; historical satellite estimates diverge ~+/-9.5%.

Statewide ND flaring is effectively all Bakken/Williston. ~4% of ND gas is flared (96% captured); clean regulator figure.

Eagle Ford South Texas, USA Medium confidence
59.5MMcf/day flared (2020)
238MW addressable*
11.9EH/s addressable*

Methodology: VIIRS-satellite (Flaring Monitor / Payne Institute). Source: Flaring Monitor basin dataset (Payne Institute Earth Observation Group, VIIRS; EDF + Rystad)

Reported vs satellite: Satellite figure; the Eagle-Ford-isolated series has not been updated past 2020-21. 2019 was ~86 MMcf/d. No clean recent regulator-reported Eagle-Ford-only figure exists.

Most recent complete Eagle-Ford-isolated year is 2020 (vintage caveat). Flaring has fallen from the 2019 peak.

Anadarko Basin Oklahoma + Texas Panhandle, USA Low confidence
not publishedno separate flared volume

Methodology: No separately-published volume. Source: EIA Oklahoma vented+flared series (reports 0 — a data gap) + NOAA VIIRS super-resolution flare catalog (count only)

Reported vs satellite: Oklahoma regulator/EIA report 0 MMcf (the Oklahoma Corporation Commission does not collect volumetric flaring data) — a DATA GAP, not true zero. VIIRS detected 205 active Anadarko flares in 2024 but no volume is published.

Included for honesty: a gas-focused, comparatively low-flaring basin with no separately-published flared VOLUME. No mining-capacity estimate is computed without a volume.

Alberta (province total) Alberta, Canada High confidence
148.0MMcf/day flared (2024)
592MW addressable*
29.6EH/s addressable*

Methodology: Regulator-reported (Alberta Energy Regulator ST60B). Source: Alberta Energy Regulator ST60B-2024 (total flare volume 1,534.1 million m3)

Reported vs satellite: Reported. A 2025 peer-reviewed study found VIIRS UNDER-detects western-Canada flaring (many small flares missed): operators reported ~213 MMcf/d across the WCSB in 2023 vs only ~97 MMcf/d observed by satellite — the reverse of the US pattern.

Alberta province total (includes the NW-Alberta Montney). The BC Montney (BC gas is almost entirely Montney) is reported separately to the BC Energy Regulator and is not volumetrized here; the WCSB-wide reported figure is ~213 MMcf/d.

Global (all countries) Worldwide High confidence
16,159MMcf/day flared (2025)
64,636MW addressable*
3,231.8EH/s addressable*

Methodology: VIIRS-satellite (World Bank GGFR / Payne Institute). Source: World Bank Global Gas Flaring Tracker 2026 (167 bcm flared in 2025, highest since 2019)

Reported vs satellite: 100% satellite-observed (NOAA VIIRS); there is no operator-reported global counterpart. ~$54B of gas wasted; third consecutive annual increase.

The headline number: worldwide flaring, if fully captured, could theoretically power several times the entire Bitcoin network.

* Theoretical maximum — the model: addressable MW = flared MMcf/day × 4 (at ~1,037 BTU/ft³ and ~35% genset efficiency the gross figure is ~4.4 MW-e; rounded down to 4 for downtime and parasitic load); addressable EH/s = MW × 0.05 (at ~20 J/TH miner efficiency). Assumes 100% of flared gas is captured and converted, which no basin approaches — real capture is a small fraction. Flared-gas volumes are as reported by the cited regulator or observed by satellite (VIIRS) for the stated year; per-basin flaring is not cleanly or consistently published, and satellite-observed volumes usually EXCEED operator/regulator-reported ones — each row states its methodology and confidence. The addressable-MW and hashrate figures are a THEORETICAL MAXIMUM computed from a documented model, assuming 100% of flared gas were captured and converted to mining power — which no basin approaches in practice (flaring is dispersed across thousands of intermittent wells, and capture economics vary). Read them as an upper bound on the opportunity, not an achievable figure. Not investment advice. Pairs with the generator fuel calculator and stranded-energy mining. Reviewed 2026-07-16; next review 2026-10-16.

See also the off-grid generator fuel calculator (what that electricity actually costs), stranded-energy mining, and energy independence.